THE TRULY EXTRAORDINARY GIFT

Mark 12:38-44; Psalm 104:1-24

November 8, 2009 – Rev. Jerry Duggins

 

 

I find myself in a bit of a dilemma this morning. I want to talk about stewardship, especially as it relates to our commitments of financial offerings for the coming year… but our story from Mark’s gospel is a little resistant to this application. I know this hasn’t stopped preachers from using the “widow’s mite” on stewardship dedication Sunday. It is in fact quite a popular text for this purpose.

 

“Look at this widow,” they say. “What a marvelous example of sacrificial giving!” These are the “give till it hurts” preachers. They love to tell stories about people who write the church check first before paying any other bills. They talk about the tithe and emphasize that it begins at ten percent, but that those who are better off should really consider going beyond that. Sacrificial giving, after all, can’t be a flat tax. There are plenty of people for whom ten per cent doesn’t involve much of a sacrifice. These preachers don’t usually go so far as to pull the “guilt” card. They try to keep the message positive, focusing on the benefits of generosity and much of what they have to say is true. As human beings, we have a need to give. Even scientists are beginning to recognize this. Recent studies in evolutionary theory are suggesting that cooperation is a third major principle alongside Darwin’s other two. Cooperation in this context is described as giving up some individual benefit in order to improve the welfare of the species.

 

So, generosity is an important quality in the Christian life. Paul lists it as one of the fruits of the spirit; but the story of the widow’s mite… well, there are some problems here. Conveniently forgotten, before Jesus sits down to watch people putting money into the temple treasury, he warns the people to beware of the scribes, who, he says, “devour widows’ houses.” When you think about this, you have to wonder whether the widow’s offering is an illustration of generosity that we ought to imitate or an illustration of an oppressive system of offerings that impoverish those who are already poor. I believe I talked about this aspect of the story the last time I preached on this, but I want to say some things directly related to stewardship that connect with this aspect.

 

First, we should be aware that we are not giving money to God with our financial commitments. We are only asking God’s blessings on these gifts to the ministry of the church. The money helps the church do ministry. It does nothing for God. As Bono says in a song with U2, “God isn’t short of cash, mister.”

 

People will sometimes talk about the tithe as the portion of our income that we give to God and there is some support for this kind of language in the Old Testament; but in practical terms, the tithe supported the Levites, so that they could focus their efforts on doing the work of faith. Our gifts are about the ministry of the church, and our prayers are our way of seeking guidance from God in the use of these gifts.

 

Because our offerings are about the ministry of the church, they are in fact gifts to the world, to God’s world. When we nurture people in the faith through our education programs, it is ultimately not about our own personal welfare. We nurture people for  ministry in the world. When we consider whether the church is being a faithful steward of the money we entrust to it; one question we should ask is, “Am I being equipped for ministry in my world?”

 

We’ve been asked by a number of people to consider our contributions of time, talent and treasure to the church. I want us to take this seriously, doing an honest, rational assessment of what we can give; and this is exactly what the widow does not do. She puts all her money into a temple treasury that supports a religious organization that Jesus has just finished criticizing. The temple treasury was probably not the best use of her money. But obviously she loved her faith and trusted her leaders. Perhaps the temple had taken good care of her in her poverty, but Jesus’ critique doesn’t suggest that they did.

 

So the second point I want to make here is that you should make sure that your mortgage can be paid before you write the church check. The church is not interested in depriving you of your home. It is not interested in encouraging the kind of sacrificial giving that leaves you impoverished.

 

There are always some people who complain that the church is always asking for money. If you are one of those people, listen closely. The church is not interested in money that you are not willing to give cheerfully, and it is certainly not interested in money that you cannot afford to give. In the church we provide opportunities for people to contribute to ministries that make the world a better place. Opportunities, not demands.

 

If I seem a little sensitive on this point, it’s because I want to be sensitive to the reality that some of us are struggling in these difficult economic times. If circumstances prevent you from being as generous as previous years, don’t feel guilty. If your circumstances are as good or better than last year, please consider this an invitation, an opportunity to contribute a larger portion of the church’s financial resources for ministry. In either case, we are doing well, putting the resources entrusted to us to good use. Many churches will be tightening their belts in the coming year, but I know that we will be expanding our ministry in 2010, thanks to your generosity in previous years.

 

So as we think about our time, talent and treasure, I want us to be realistic in our estimates, generous as well, but I’m not interested in anyone bankrupting themselves on any of these points. Stewardship is not an invitation to the irrational; it’s the faithful exercise of God’s gifts to each of us. The nature of those gifts is not in being used up, but in multiplying themselves. But this is not what the widow’s mite is about. So you see my dilemma. It doesn’t really offer us insight into what number to write on our financial commitment card. It’s not about how much time we should give to the church, what talents we ought to exercise.

 

No, the widow’s offering goes deeper than this, for our time talents and treasures do not define the core of who we are. There is more to us than these accidents of fate. Most of us have little freedom in how we spend most of our time. Our employers demand a chunk. Our children shape how much of the rest of it is used and in this world filled with opportunities the competition for our time is intense. Talent can be somewhat ephemeral. Age usually limits our abilities. Things we were good at in our youth, we struggle to recall in mid-life. On the positive side we develop new talents. They come and go, but still aren’t the things that fill our lives with meaning. And treasures are a fickle thing. Hard work does not guarantee wealth and many discovered in the last year that even a sound investment can suffer loss.

 

All these things can enrich the life of the church and bless its ministries, but even so their transitory nature gives an ebb and flow to church life that leaves us up some days and down others. They are not at the core of what holds us together anymore than they define our individual value to God.

 

Jesus sees something more than two small coins in this widow’s offering. He sees her very life; all that she has to live on. And in this he sees his own death. After making this observation about the widow, Jesus leaves the temple and begins talking to his disciples about the destruction of the temple, the signs of the end, and then the passion narrative begins. No more teaching, no more miracles, no more healing: the rest of Mark’s gospel is about his offering, his two small coins, all that he has to live on, quite literally.

 

Maybe you’re starting to see my dilemma a little better now. The stewardship team has asked us to consider how we might put our time, talents and treasures to use through the church, but this story is really about putting it all on the line, risking everything for the possibility of a new life. The Book of Order, part of the constitution for the Presbyterian Church, puts it this way.

 

“The Church is called to be a sign in and for the world of the new reality which God has made available to people in Jesus Christ…. The Church is called to undertake this mission even at the risk of losing its life, trusting in God alone as the author and giver of life, sharing the gospel, and doing those deeds in the world that point beyond themselves to the new reality in Christ.”  (G-3.0200, 3.0400)

 

A few weeks ago, we talked about the rich man, whom Jesus had asked to sell everything he had and give it to the poor. You’ll recall that he went away sad because he was very rich. Well, it isn’t any easier for a poor person to do this, and yet here, we have widow who gives away everything she has to live on. I remember times when Janet and I had to poke around the couch for bus fare. Still I wasn’t poor, but I thought, if only I had a little more money, the things I could do. I still think sometimes that a little more money would help me get what I want. I still have this notion that money can make you happy, that lack of money causes a great deal of unhappiness. These kinds of ideas give money power over us. They can limit our sense of freedom. The widow may have been as trapped in her dependence on money as the rich man, but she breaks free with this extraordinary gift, all that she has to live on.

 

Please don’t take this as an endorsement of gambling, but the image that comes to mind with this widow’s offering is a poker player who’s “all in” with no intention of showing his/her cards; puts all their money in, then folds and walks away from the table. This widow isn’t gambling. She’s not expecting to leave the temple and stumble on a twenty dollar bill because she gave all her money to God. She’s breaking an attachment to money as a means of living, so that she can live a whole new kind of life. And that is not what we are doing, or being asked to do, on stewardship dedication Sunday.

 

Today is about the ordinary gifts, not the extraordinary. After all, we’ll be asked to do this again next year. So don’t sell the house to pay your pledge.  Although, you might remember that for a brief time in some faith communities, this was the practice. Acts talks about an early group of Christians, who held all things in common, and shared with its members as each had need. And you may recall the story of Ananias and Sapphira who sold a piece of property and withheld some of the proceeds for themselves. Churches use this story when they want to run a “scare campaign.” We’re not doing that, but I want us to think again about these two small coins, because there is a sense in which Christians are “all in”, a sense in which we put everything on the line. In fact, we only live the Christian life through the extraordinary gift, which is both the gift that Jesus offered on the way to resurrection, and the gift of faithfulness and devotion to Christ that we offer.

 

You simply don’t get to the new life without giving up the old. You can’t make a new commitment without letting go of some old ones.

 

When we join the church, we claim Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. What does this mean, if it doesn’t mean putting our time, talent and treasure in the service of the proclamation of the gospel? When did Jesus ever teach that a little more money would make us happy? How does the church become “a sign in and for the world of the new reality in Christ” without followers committed to the extraordinary gift? You may think it good news that God doesn’t need your money, but the truth is that God is interested in something far more costly, your very soul.

 

Maybe that word, “soul,” doesn’t resonate with you as it does with me; so let me tell you what I understand by this word. I’m not talking about that piece of you reserved for heaven, but something at the core of your being that is committed to life, especially this life. The soul gives you courage in the face of scary times, hope when circumstances seem to call for despair. It’s your connection to God that reminds you that you are never alone. Soul is what the widow discovered when she let go of those two small coins and what Jesus always knew he had, even as he faced his own death. And most importantly, soul is the energy that makes resurrection possible. Soul is what makes it possible to the right thing, the good thing, even “at the risk of losing one’s life.”

 

Soul is what the church needs to transform these ordinary gifts this morning into something truly extraordinary. For the church, itself, must be seeking new life as well; not because it does not value and celebrate its past, but because the world is not the same and the church is not the same. The rise in the number of memorial services this year should tell us that our ministry around times of death is becoming more important than it was in the early days of this church. Even so, medical technology has prolonged life and improved the quality of people’s lives well into their senior years, making it possible for those even into their nineties to offer significant service. On the other side of the age spectrum, our young people face challenges never imagined by those of us past our youth. As diversity becomes more evident, the need to be more intentional about maintaining the bonds of peace and love becomes more important.

 

Westminster is in the midst of its own birth pangs. It will take more than time talent and treasure to get us through. We will need to forge a new vision, some elements of which are already becoming apparent. That vision will need to include a firmer connection and interaction with the world beyond these walls. Our history of a commitment to mission may help or hinder us in this. The commitment piece will be critical, but we will need to re-conceptualize our understanding of mission if we are to connect the good news with the needs of the world. The vision will need to include ministry across the age spectrum, a commitment to diversity that goes beyond mere tolerance to embracing the differences between us, and a renewed commitment to spiritual growth that addresses itself to the many different spirituality types. We will have to embrace the new tools available for biblical interpretation and engage each other through scripture and prayer. This kind of new life will require an investment of soul.

 

Maybe this sounds like a lot of work, but being light to the world and salt for the earth is not for the timid. These times call for courage, but I don’t think it’s going to require all your money or that you spend all your time at church, or that you devote all your talent just to Westminster. I certainly hope that you will be generous in all these things. We will do well with whatever is given, if some of us will consider this widow’s two small coins, the life that Jesus offered, and the extraordinary gift that we all have to give, our very selves, our hearts to the ministry of Christ’s church, our soul. We may not be richer for it or have more members; but this is the key to a new life, the “sign in and for the world of the new reality in Christ Jesus, our Lord and Savior. Amen.